The series finale of Netflix's 13 Reasons Why has been heavily criticized for its depiction of a queer death and its reinforcement of stigmas against LGBTQIA+ individuals. This controversial ending has highlighted numerous issues with the show's portrayal of sensitive topics, including the stigmatization of HIV/AIDS and other harmful stereotypes. These problems are exacerbated by scenes such as the tragic fate of a gay character, drawing significant backlash and leading many to label the finale as homophobic. It didn’t have to be this way, and there are compelling reasons to consider how different storytelling choices could have led to a more respectful and impactful conclusion.
The Problematic Treatment of HIV/AIDS
One of the most criticized aspects of the 13 Reasons Why finale is its handling of HIV/AIDS. The show depicts the progression of HIV to AIDS in a queer character, culminating in their death. This portrayal has been deemed insensitive and perpetuates negative stereotypes about LGBTQIA+ individuals, particularly gay men. Critics argue that the show could have approached this topic with more care, potentially showing characters living healthy lives with the virus, discussing preventative measures like PrEP, and promoting regular testing.
13 Reasons Why Gay Sex Scenes Matter
Representations of gay sex and queer relationships in popular media are pivotal for societal acceptance and understanding. In 13 Reasons Why, the inclusion of such scenes is meant to contribute towards normalizing queer relationships. However, instead of fostering acceptance, the finale's depiction contributes to harmful stereotypes. A more thoughtful representation could have focused on the complexities and depth of queer relationships without resorting to tragic conclusions.
Reinforcing Negative Stereotypes
The finale of 13 Reasons Why has also been criticized for reinforcing negative stereotypes beyond just its treatment of HIV/AIDS. The show’s depiction of Oakland, often associated with homelessness, drug use, and HIV transmission, disrespects the city’s historical activism and vibrant community. Moreover, characters like Monty de la Cruz, a closeted gay character whose repressed sexuality led to violent behaviors, only serve to perpetuate harmful and outdated tropes.
Failures in Queer Representation
LGBTQIA+ representation in 13 Reasons Why has always been a mixed bag. While characters like Charlie St. George offered positive depictions of bisexuality, other storylines fell short. Monty's false murder accusation and subsequent death, and the reduction of his character to harmful stereotypes, highlights a significant failure in delivering nuanced queer representation. The show missed an opportunity to explore his trauma and complexity more deeply.
The Importance of Diverse Storytelling
Accurate and sensitive storytelling is crucial, especially when dealing with marginalized communities. 13 Reasons Why attempted to tackle various heavy topics but often failed to do so with the necessary respect and sensitivity. Characters’ hardships, particularly those within the LGBTQIA+ community, should not be mere plot devices. Instead, their identities and experiences should be explored with depth, care, and purpose.
Thank you for reading. Discover more engaging articles like this on our homepage, and be sure to follow us on our social media platforms for updates and more content.